Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

The Slits with Northern Liberties, Shellshag, Satanized and Rad Racket - Danger Danger Gallery (Philadelphia, PA) - March 22, 2008


27 March 2008

Shellshag @ Danger Danger Gallery 3-22-08

My second trip to Danger Danger Gallery was quite unlike the first. As opposed to the show I saw there last month, where TIMES NEW VIKING and several other bands played to only a handful of people on a chilly weeknight, this was a big Saturday night show that, at its capacity, felt like hundreds of people were squeezed into the rather limited space. I was excited to see THE SLITS for only the second time ever (the first time being a year and a half ago at the First Unitarian Church) and was quite thrilled that they’d chosen a venue only a few blocks from my apartment for their third visit to Philadelphia in the last few years. However, a band I knew next to nothing about beforehand (SHELLSHAG) almost ended up stealing the show.

First things first, though. RAD RACKET (formerly RED ROCKET), the Danger Danger “house band”, opened the show in the gallery space with a great mix of punk and art-damaged prog-rock to go along with screaming vocals that weren’t annoying. Their set was similar to when they opened for BLACK DICE and PISSED JEANS last November at the Vacuum.

SATANIZED follow them a few minutes later in the basement. I liked the music, which reminded me a lot of mid ‘80s BLACK FLAG, FLIPPER, THE MELVINS and stoner and doom metal along with some early ‘90s hardcore bands like MEREL, ICONOCLAST and BORN AGAINST. However, the vocals left quite a bit to be desired and perhaps for that reason, I just wasn’t feeling it.

The biggest surprise of the evening came with SHELLSHAG. After Satanized’s set, I caught some fresh air when I heard them covering THE HEARTBREAKERS/JOHNNY THUNDERS classic “Born to Lose”. Of course, I walked in immediately and the rest of their set was just mesmerizing. They are a male/female duo with the male half on guitar and vocals with the woman on drums. I realize that my description of them sounds like THE WHITE STRIPES, but the music was way rawer and the show much more uninhibited than Jack or Meg. At least half of their set after that point consisted of covers as well. These ranged from the great WIPERS track “Mystery” (from their debut Is This Real?) to LIZ PHAIR’s “Fuck and Run” to WHEN IN ROME’s “The Promise”. They were sloppy, but clearly in love with playing and just there to have fun. The guitarist played a flying V and had long blonde hair, but this was no hair metal act or ironic fashion show. This was pure, kickass rock and roll! To prove their point further, they destroyed a floor tom at the end of their set with both members (and several members of the audience) helping out with the destruction of said instrument by poking holes at it on both sides with drumsticks! It was a site to behold!

It was a hard act to follow, but I decided to check out part of NORTHERN LIBERTIES’ set in the basement and despite their best efforts and a lot of energy, they didn’t do anything for me. Perhaps part of it was the buzz of seeing the previous performance or perhaps they’re just not really my cup of tea (honestly I barely remember what they sounded like except they had the requisite screamy vocals that seem all the rage these days), but whatever it was, I just wasn’t feeling their set.

Therefore, I went back upstairs to get a good spot for The Slits, who seemed to take forever to get to the stage and set up. As per usual, ARI UP complained about the sound throughout their set, especially early on, even threatening to stop the show if the situation wasn’t improved because she said she couldn’t hear herself. Here is where a band used to playing in more professional venues can get into trouble if they expect the same accommodations. Nevertheless, Up and the rest of the Slits made the most of it despite (or perhaps because of) her various eccentricities and the sound issues (though they sounded fine from my vantage point). They started the set off with four songs from their debut album Cut and then, after Ari declared that she’s sick of it, they were about to launch into a newer song. They didn’t do this, either, because then she declared that she was sick of the new stuff, too. Thus, they went into “Earthbeat” (from their great and underrated 2nd Lp Return of the Giant Slits, which these days I play more than the 1st album), which culminated in Ari getting the entire crowd to make bird noises. After that, they played a few other songs that I didn’t recognize, for the most part, and then that was it. It was a short set that couldn’t have lasted for over 45 minutes, but considering how sweaty and packed it was for their set, I didn’t complain! Overall, they were tighter than they were the first time they played here with this lineup a few years ago, but my enjoyment of the show was hampered a bit by two things.

First off, the gas face has to go out to the knuckleheads who decide to pogo, skank and slam-dance in the middle of an insanely crowded gallery space, thus knocking into people who had no room to get away from “the pit”, as it were. I’m not asking people to behave like it’s a religious study session, especially at a punk show, but please have some consideration for others’ personal space. I’m big and I have no problem thwarting off the offenders (though it’s annoying as I’d rather be watching the show), but it’s not so easy for those much smaller folks. As for the next thing I’m about to say, if you don’t believe that politics belongs on this blog or in my column, I urge you to stop reading now.

OK you’re still here? It’s full disclosure time. I have been a vocal supporter of BARACK OBAMA’s Presidential campaign for some time now and have donated money to the campaign and volunteered for it on a number of occasions as well. Thus, I found it disappointing that Ari Up endorsed HILLARY CLINTON right before she and the rest of The Slits left the stage. I wasn’t surprised by this because I read about this a few days before, though I was initially a bit surprised that she didn’t have a negative attitude towards all of the major candidates, as many radical leftists tend to, and instead that she was engaging in the political process. Nevertheless, I find it disappointing that even after the way that the Clintons have conducted themselves in this campaign, some clearly have no problem with this and support her anyway. Perhaps in her case, as the leader of one of the first all-female punk bands and one who came of age in the ‘70s, she feels like she should support the female candidate. However, this undermines the ideals of both feminism and equality if gender alone, and not a candidate’s merit, is worthy of an individual’s support. Nevertheless, not all of The Slits support her, as this intriguing Idolator piece points out. In any case, I can talk much more on this subject, so feel free to comment away.

The Shellshag picture above was taken by KEVIN RILEY of Northern Liberties. You can see more of his photos here. He also took some great shots of Rad Racket and Satanized as well, so they’re well worth a look. Anyhow, the photo is used with permission. I just hope he doesn’t get mad when he reads the above review, but I have to be one hundred percent honest!

Filed under concerts punk

Comments

matt-
i agree with adding what you added. i think its important for this stuff to be discussed any where and everywhere.

as for the rest of the review: top notch! i had to miss their show here as i had to make an emergency trip back home. but reports sound like this was way better then the show they did here.

i will have to check out shellshag.


cinchel    2008-03-28 13:32    #

Further re the earlier comment, I have to disagree on stylistic grounds. The tone (not the content—express away!) of the political comments doesn’t match the review. I think you would have been better served either (1) thinking through how to better integrate the comments more organically into what is otherwise a performance review or (2) writing a separate column to discuss it. Politics can have a place, but as written the aside is a bit jarring on stylistic and rhetorical grounds.

Hmm, rereading I think the problem is that all you have to go on is Ari’s quick “Go Hillary!” or whatever she said at the end. You don’t why she feels that way, leaving you to get a little carried away in your musings about what is essentially a straw man. I think that’s why it jars—without more input from Ari, it reads like a snippet from a half-digested conversation with yourself. It needs something else to really make it work.

Sorry, I edit and write myself—can’t help the critiquing! Hope this is taken in the spirit in which it is intended.


— Carl    2008-03-28 23:16    #

Don’t worry Carl. I’m not offended. Some of the issues you expressed are why I almost didn’t include my political commentary in the review. I will admit that, of course, I don’t know why Ari feels that way except for one thing. She said that the Republicans will win in the general election if Obama is the Democratic nominee. Talk about a strawman argument, especially since all the polls indicate that he will get more independents and Republicans to cross over and vote for him than Hillary (who already starts off with negatives at or near 50 percent and probably more now due to how her campaign has been conducted). This just furthers the scaredy cats who think that a black man can’t be elected President. They think that Hillary, as a more-known politician, has a better chance but I believe this is false. Furthermore, I think Obama is a big change from the Bush-lite of the Clinton years. Furthermore, she expressed incredulity at what she called the mass hysteria (I’m paraphrasing here) of the Obama movement. This is just a blanket dismissal based on folks being skeptical of movements and not doing their homework.

Otherwise, though, you’re right in that I don’t know why she feels that way. However, because she said the comment I paraphrased above from the stage (which I didn’t mention in the review) at the end of their set last Saturday, I feel that not only can I go on about it (even though I don’t usually use this space for politics) since I am reviewing part of the performance (which includes interaction with the audience and between-song banter), but that it deserves criticism as well.


Matthew Berlyant    2008-03-29 14:21    #

Matthew :: No hard feeling about your take on us Northern Liberties… We are a weirdo band that gets mixed reviews all the time, You either love it or you hate it. – Kevin Riley


Kevin Riley    2008-03-30 21:24    #

Matthew, you must learn to understand and embrace identity politics, which is the basis of modern American liberalism.

If you are a person of color, you must support the candidate of color. If you are a woman, you must support the female candidate. However, if you are white or male, you are a racist if you support the white candidate and a sexist if you support the male candidate. Edwards didn’t stand a chance.


— GEAH    2008-04-07 04:19    #

Well judging by the above, I must be sexist then. As Nigel Tufnel once said in response to that accusation, though, what’s wrong with being sexy? :-)

In all seriousness, I like Edwards, but his voting record in the Senate unfortunately didn’t match the rhetoric he espoused when he was still in the race. Nevertheless, I think he would make a fine Attorney General. Don’t you?


Matt Berlyant    2008-04-08 16:54    #

An ambulance chaser and politician as Attorney General?

You have got to be kidding.

A sensible person would hire someone with law enforcement experience for that job.


— GEAH    2008-04-14 23:57    #

Who would you suggest for the AG job then? As long as it’s not Alberto Gonzales or someone of his ilk, of course. :-)


Matt Berlyant    2008-04-23 10:05    #